|
Sugar Maple in Sica Hollow, northeasternmost South Dakota. |
For April's tree-following report I'm sticking with my strategy of following (learning about) South Dakota trees—helpful in preparing our guide to trees and shrubs of the state. This month I chose maples, of which there are three.
South Dakota is not known for its trees. It's largely a prairie state, though much of what was prairie is now fields of corn, wheat, soybeans, hay, sunflowers and more. Most people who visit (i.e., tourists) head straight for the Black Hills in the far west, which are mostly covered in coniferous forest (that's why they look black).
But far eastern South Dakota also is forested. It's part of the immense Eastern Deciduous Forest (EDF) ecoregion, which covers the eastern third of the United States and extends into southeast Canada and northeast Mexico.
|
Globally, the North American EDF is one of the largest parts of the Temperate Broadleaf Forest Biome (yellow green). Source. |
Authorities frequently claim that the EDF reaches its western limit in Minnesota, but they're wrong. It continues into South Dakota where it's best developed in the southeast and northeast corners of the state.
|
South Dakota land cover. Dark green units in the southeast and northeast are large stands of Eastern Deciduous Forest (modified from Johnson & Knight 2022). |
EDF thrives where summers are warm and moist and winters are cold, as is the case in easternmost South Dakota (summers are increasingly dry going west). As the name indicates, the dominant trees lose their leaves each winter. These include oak, elm, basswood (linden), hackberry, and maples.
|
Eastern Deciduous Forest in northeast South Dakota, with a thick understory of young Sugar Maples hoping to reach the sky. |
Of the three maple species in South Dakota, two are native to the far east—Sugar Maple and Silver Maple. However Silver Maple is widely planted, and escapees are occasionally found in the wild as far west as the Black Hills. The botanists who described and named these maples long ago chose very similar scientific names:
Acer saccharum and
A. saccharinum (thanks, guys, I hope I can keep them straight!). Both mean sugary, referring to the sap (
Saccharum is the genus name for sugarcane). However the Sugar Maple's sap is far sweeter (
Plant Finder, Missouri Botanical Garden).
These two maples are similar in appearance, enough so that some effort is needed to tell them apart. Both have what we think of as typical maple leaves—palmately lobed, like the fingers of a hand. Fortunately the details differ, which is more easily shown with photos than explained with words. But we intend to do both.
Leaves of Sugar Maple are more shallowly lobed with broader sinuses (gaps) between the main lobes. The sinuses usually are less than half the overall leaf length and are rounded at the bottom.
Leaves of Silver Maple are more deeply lobed, and with narrower sinuses between the main lobes. The sinuses usually are at least half the length of the leaf and are more pointed at the bottom.
|
Silver Maple, Acer saccharinum (MWI). |
Both trees develop furrowed ridged bark with maturity, but that of the Silver Maple is more flaky, enough to make it look shaggy ... or so they say. Do you have tips for telling these two maples apart? If so, please leave a Comment below.
|
Sugar Maple, Acer saccharum (MWI).
|
|
Silver Maple, Acer saccharinum (MWI)—a bit shaggy?
|
Now for those readers about fall off their chairs with curiosity ... there is indeed a third maple in South Dakota. But it's a trickster.
|
Yes, this IS a maple! |
|
It's a maple with lobes so deep that they're leaflets. |
This is
Acer negundo, the Boxelder—also known as Ashleaf Maple (ash has similar leaves), Manitoba Maple, Érable à feuilles composées, and Poison Ivy Tree (not poisonous but leaflets are similar in shape). Instead of palmately lobed leaves typical of maples, it has pinnately compound ones—divided into paired leaflets with one more at the tip.
In contrast with Sugar Maple and Silver Maple, which are uncommon in South Dakota and limited to the far east, Boxelder is common and widespread across the state, and apparently not terribly picky about habitat. Some call it a weed.
|
The Boxelder I followed in 2018—a bit of wildscaping for this warehouse. |
This is my contribution to the monthly gathering of tree-followers kindly hosted by
The Squirrelbasket. More news
here.
Sources cited
Johnson, W. Carter, and Knight, Dennis H. 2022. Ecology of Dakota Landscapes; past, present, and future. Yale University Press; Biodiversity Institute, U. Wyoming. ISBN 978-0-300-25381-8.
Another interesting post, and good pictures. xx
ReplyDeleteThank you, I have zero tips for telling them apart lol. But I do quite like a shaggy trunk.
ReplyDeleteFun! I love South Dakota...the prairies AND the woodlands. That's part of what I love about the Madison area. We're on the edge of prairie and woodland, and actually originally Oak savanna, which is kind of in between. Anyway, great post, as always! I've been finding a few Box Elder seedlings in the woods out back...which isn't unusual, but the big Oaks reign here.
ReplyDeleteAh, I remember that Boxelder! And the truck...
ReplyDeleteI do love maples but there is no way I can recognise the different species, except perhaps the Norway maple.
Those two you have described do have very different leaves, though - shame about the naming convention...
I'm very pleased your tree following has a dual purpose this year.
All the very best :)
Hello Flighty, tz, Beth and SB ... I've been on the road so am late in attending to my blog. Thanks for visiting.
DeleteBeth I'm envious of your big oaks, saw my first big bur oaks last week, am used to much smaller and even shrubby ones.
Best wishes to you all.
I appreciate the detailed overview of maples in South Dakota. It's fascinating to learn about the variety of trees in different regions, and how the Eastern Deciduous Forest extends into South Dakota. For those interested in the beauty and characteristics of maples, especially beyond just the local varieties, Japanese Maples are another excellent example worth exploring. Their unique features and adaptability make them a great addition to any landscape. Keep up the great work on sharing such informative content!
ReplyDeleteHello ABR, thanks for the comment and encouragement. At first wasn't sure it was acceptable (advertising?), but what the heck ... best wishes!
Delete