"ruins of some ancient city built of marble and porphyry" (Joseph Nicollet, 1843). |
Joseph Nicollet produced the earliest accurate map of the upper Mississippi region, using instrument readings and astronomically determined points. Rumsey Historical Map Collection; blue labels added. |
Pipestone Quarry on the Coteau des Prairies by George Catlin, 1836-1837. Bluff in distance is "the most striking feature of this place" wrote Catlin. Smithsonian Museum of American Art |
"To reach [pipestone] now, it is necessary to blast a superincumbent stratum ... four and a half feet thick, which could not have been effected with their limited means; so that they were delighted to see us coming in this particular to their assistance. I set my men at work upon it; and in three days the quarry was opened and disencumbered." [Quotes are from Nicollet's 1843 report unless noted otherwise.]While his men blasted and removed rock, Nicollet and two assistants explored, made astronomical observations for mapping, and studied the bluff bordering the valley to the west. It was made of the same hard rock that covered the pipestone in the valley below.
"Its slope to the west is rugged, presenting a surface of rocks throughout its whole length, that form a very picturesque appearance ... The principal rock that strikes the attention of the observer in this remarkable inland bluff, is an indurated (metamorphic) sand-rock or quartzite, the red color of which diminishes in intensity from the base to the summit."
In the journal Nicollet kept during the expedition, he called the rock "old red sandstone". But in his 1843 report this was expanded to hardened sandstone or quartzite. Thus Nicollet recognized the rock's true nature. Sand grains were present yet the rock was much harder than sandstone. But is it quartzite?
Sioux Quartzite from Sioux Falls, SD, not far from the pipestone quarry; 5.9 cm across. James St. John photo. |
Closeup of James St. John photo, c. ¼ of sample. |
Others disagree. Sandstone that is so well-cemented that it fractures through the sand grains rather than around them is indeed quartzite:
"A defining characteristic for distinguishing quartzite from sandstone is that when broken with a rock hammer, the quartz crystals break across the grains. In a sandstone, only a thin mineral cement holds the grains together, meaning that a broken piece of sandstone will leave the grains intact."
Nicollet's very hard rock does indeed break across the grains (Gries 1996, p. 77), but the terminology dispute may be irrelevant. In 1870, it officially became the Sioux Quartzite.
Sioux Quartzite at Gitchie Manitou State Preserve, the oldest bedrock exposed in Iowa. PBS. |
Like Nicollet, White found the rock to be extremely hard and yet so similar to sandstone:
"It is an intensely hard rock, breaking with a splintery fracture, and a color varying in different localities from a bright to deep red. Although it is so compact and hard the grains of sand of which it was originally composed are yet distinctly to be seen, and even the ripple marks upon its bedding surfaces are sometimes found as distinct as they were when the rock was a mass of incoherent sand in the shallow waters in which it was accumulated."
The Sioux Quartzite contains no fossils, so to assign it a place in geologic time White relied on its position relative to other rock layers and its degree of alteration. Because it occurred below and was therefore older than Paleozoic strata in Iowa, and because it had been so thoroughly cemented, he tentatively placed it in "AZOIC SYSTEM. HURONIAN (?) GROUP"—among the oldest rocks in the region (3). Today's geologists agree.
Falls of the Big Sioux River, courtesy To Behold the Beauty; CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 |
In some ways we aren't much better off than White 150 years ago. Neither fossils nor absolute dates are available for the Sioux Quartzite, and its age continues to be constrained based on what's above and below. This makes it somewhere between 2.3 and 1.1 billion years old, a huge span. However there's a quartzite in Wisconsin that is very similar and probably was deposited at the same time—the Baraboo Quartzite. Its age is much more tightly constrained, between 1.76 and 1.64 billion years (Anderson 1987). Likely the Sioux Quartzite also is c. 1.7 billion years old.
The Sioux and Baraboo are thought to be remnants of a great wedge of sand that accumulated along the southern margin of a young North America (4). It was massive—to 3000 m thick! This is not far-fetched if we keep in mind that 1.7 billion years ago there were no plants on land. Erosion was far more consequential.
Now we're faced with another puzzle. How does a "mass of incoherent sand" (as White called it) become quartzite? Another Iowa geologist, Samuel W. Beyer, tried to answer this question in his early study of the Sioux Quartzite (1897). He looked at thin sections under a microscope and saw well-rounded grains of quartz (silica) strongly bound together with a quartz cement. This cement was difficult to explain. "[Because] it is improbable that the rock has been able to furnish sufficient silica to cement itself, the natural inference is that the percolating waters received their silica burden from some extraneous source ... perhaps a deposit long since removed".
Beyer's problem was timing—he lived too long ago. Geologists now know that quartzite can furnish sufficient silica to cement itself. For example if it's buried 2–3 km under younger deposits and temperatures reach c. 70º C, quartz cement can develop on the sand grains. For more, see burial metamorphism and authigenic quartz cement (great conversation starters too!).
What ever the source of cement, the quartzite ridge was extremely hard and persistent. It survived hundreds of millions of years of deposition and erosion, most recently by glaciers on a continental scale.
Background image courtesy NASA. |
The Sioux Quartzite was buried once again, and remains mostly buried except for limited outcrops revealed by erosion. However well-drillers have encountered it below the surface over a much larger area—to about 45 miles west of Pierre and south into Nebraska.
Sioux Quartzite occurs at the surface in shaded areas, and below the surface in stippled areas. Dots are drilled wells—black hit the Sioux, white did not (modified from Anderson 1987). |
On a rainy day in May, I took a break from botanizing and drove to Sioux Falls to restock my larder. Then I headed to the Palisades on Split Rock Creek to see something of the hiding dog. After the rain stopped I spent the evening admiring quartzite lit by golden light, as did Joseph Nicollet at the end of a rainy day in 1838:
"The rest of the day was spent ... in admiring the beautiful effects of lights and shadows produced by the western sun as it illumed the several parts of the bluff, composed of red rocks of different shades, extending a league in length, and presenting the appearance of the ruins of some ancient city built of marble and porphyry."
Above and below: joints at right angles (orthogonal) are common in the Sioux Quartzite.
Sand grains with rockcress for scale (larger leaves c. 1 cm wide).
The next day we explored more of the Palisades, at a day-use area.
Descending to Split Rock Creek. |
Palisades Bridge, built in 1908. |
In putting together geology posts, I often discover I missed much of interest and therefore must return. That's definitely the case here. There's Pipestone National Monument of course, but also Jim Kersten's Sioux Quartzite Outcrop Trail—40+ sites in South Dakota, Minnesota and Iowa that feature the quartzite "naturally or architecturally"!! 😊
US Courthouse in Sioux Falls, built of Sioux Quartzite. Source. |
Notes
(1) Surveyor Joseph Nicollet left France, probably because of financial problems, and sailed to the United States thinking he could find work in the largely unmapped territories. He was first employed by a fur trading company. His resulting map of the upper Mississippi River so impressed staff of the new US Army Corps of Topographic Engineers that he was asked to lead the agency's first expedition. He surveyed the upper Mississippi drainage in 1838 and 1839, and surely would have done much more if he hadn't died young.
(2) Rock with quartz sand grains that are thoroughly cemented with quartz is sometimes called orthoquartzite or quartz arenite See Quartzite in Sandatlas.
(3) AZOIC SYSTEM. HURONIAN (?) GROUP is roughly equivalent to today's Archean rocks of the Superior Craton or the Huronian Supergroup. More here.
(4) Experts disagree on the environment of deposition for Sioux and Baraboo sand. Some argue for braided rivers, others for shallow offshore water. Or perhaps early deposition was riverine, with marine occurring later (Ojakangas & Weber 1984; Southwick et al. 1986).
Sources, in addition to links in post
Anderson, RR. 1987. Precambrian Sioux Quartzite at Gitchie Manitou State Preserve, IA. GSA Centennial Field Guide. PDF
Andrews, J. 2019? On the Quartzite Trail. South Dakota Magazine.
Beyer, S. W. 1897. The Sioux Quartzite and certain associated rocks. Iowa Geological Survey Annual Report 6:67-112. PDF
Gries, JP. 1996. Roadside Geology of South Dakota. Mountain Press Publishing Co.
Iowa DNR. Gitchie Manitou State Preserve in State Preserve Guide. PDF.
Johnson, C, et al. 2017. Metamorphic Environments in An Introduction to Geology. Salt Lake Community College online.
Nicolett, JN. 1843. Report intended to illustrate a map of the hydrographical basin of the upper Mississippi river. US Senate, 28th Congress, 2nd session, no. 237. BHL
Ojakangas, RW, & Weber, RE. 1984. Petrography and paleocurrents of the lower Proterozoic Sioux Quartzite, Minnesota and South Dakota. in Shorter Contributions to the Geology of the Sioux Quartzite. U. Minnesota Report of Investigations 32. PDF
Southwick, DL, Morey, GB, & Mossler, JH. 1986. Fluvial origin of the lower Proterozoic Sioux Quartzite, southwestern Minnesota. GSA Bull. 97:1432–1441.